Interview Sarthi

Home › ApplySarthi › Auto-apply tools compared › vs LazyApply

ApplySarthi vs LazyApply

One sends as many applications as possible. The other sends fewer, aimed. The choice is really about which failure you can live with.

Public sources reviewed 18 September 2026 · Not a hands-on benchmark

Disclosure: we build ApplySarthi. Competitor information below was read from each product’s own public pages on 18 September 2026, and is linked so you can check it. Where a price is not published publicly we say so rather than repeat a figure we could not verify. This page is not a hands-on benchmark of the other products.

What we could verify

LazyApply publishes its plans openly: $99 a year for 15 applications a day and one resume profile, $149 a year for 150 a day and five profiles, and $999 a year for 1,500 a day and twenty profiles. It describes applying automatically across Greenhouse, Dice, Indeed and ZipRecruiter, with referral emails and a tracking dashboard. (Official pricing page, read 18 September 2026.)

ApplySarthi is always free. It collects open jobs from 21 sources and 754 company career boards, ranks them against your CV, rewrites the CV for the job you pick and fills that employer’s form in your own Chrome. You press submit. You supply a free Google Gemini key, so your usage is not rationed against other users. See the product facts.

Where they genuinely differ

	ApplySarthi	LazyApply
Price	Always free	$99 / $149 / $999 per year
Daily applications	As many as genuinely fit	15 / 150 / 1,500 by plan
Presses submit	No, unless you switch Autopilot on	Yes — that is the product
Indian job boards	Naukri, Foundit, Shine, Internshala, Wellfound, LinkedIn, Indeed	Greenhouse, Dice, Indeed, ZipRecruiter
CV per job	Rewritten per job, figures never invented	Resume profiles you set up in advance
You see it before it goes	Always, by default	No — submission is automatic

What should decide it

If your search is mostly United States postings on Greenhouse, Dice, Indeed and ZipRecruiter, and you want reach above all, LazyApply is built for exactly that and states its limits plainly.

If you are applying in India, the board list is the problem before price is. Naukri, Shine and Internshala together hold more open postings in our current snapshot than Greenhouse does, and none of them appear on LazyApply’s list. The technical reason is covered in the category guide.

The second question is what a high daily rate does to you. Applicant tracking systems deduplicate by email, so twenty applications to one employer arrive on one screen. Platform limits exist on any site needing a login. The safety page covers both in detail.

How to test both properly

1. Pick five real postings you would genuinely accept, and use the same five in both tools.
2. Start from the same CV file in each.
3. Read every tailored CV against your original, line by line. Any figure, date, employer or qualification that was not in your document is a reason to stop.
4. Stop before submitting in whichever tool lets you, and compare the two filled forms field by field.
5. Count fields left blank or filled wrongly, not how impressive the demonstration felt.

What we could not verify

We have not run LazyApply, measured its fill accuracy, tested its behaviour on Indian sites, or compared response rates between the two products. We have not verified whether its daily limits interact with each platform’s own caps. Its pricing page was legible and current when we read it; everything above comes from that page.

A gap here is a gap in public information, not a claim that a feature is missing. Check the company’s current pages before paying for anything.

Questions people ask